W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > February 2006

Re: HTTP in RDF (Re: Valentines' Note)

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:43:54 +0100
Message-ID: <43F1DE9A.3040707@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi Christophe

Christophe Strobbe wrote:

> I think the second item in the last list in section 2.3 (Header 
> property) should be cache-control instead of cache-xontrol.

Tnx.

> Another response header that appears to be widely supported by browsers 
> is "Refresh"; see the discussion on the WCAG list 
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2006JanMar/0078.html) 
> and the failure in the WCAG Wiki:
> http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Failure_due_to_using_server-side_techniques_to_automatically_redirect_pages_after_a_timeout. 

Is there a RFC or any other document we can reference about Refresh? Of 
course, there's a lot about using Refresh in HTML's meta element, but 
what about using it in HTTP?
-- 
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 13:45:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT