Dear Group, During the previous teleconference meeting we brainstormed further option and came up with the following alternatives: 7. value 8. label 9. output 10. rating However, we decided that earl:outcome was still the best option and decided to adopt it unless someone comes up with a better suggestion. If you have concerns about the new term earl:outcome, then please send a rationale and alternate suggestions to the ERT list by 10 January 2007. Regards, Shadi David Rooks wrote: > > Hi all, > > As per my action item, i have been looking at alternatives to > earl:validity and have come up with (IMO) 2 good options... > > 1. executionResult > 2. outcome > > A few other options which i don't think are quite as good are... > > 3. conclusion > 4. analysis > 5. assessment > 6. evaluation > > My personal preference is option 2. > > Regards, > David > > > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 11:40:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT