W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > December 2006

Re: [resolved] Earl validity - alternative terminology

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:32:39 +0100
To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tkw1gpe2wxe0ny@widsith.lan>

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:39:50 +0100, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> During the previous teleconference meeting we brainstormed further  
> option and came up with the following alternatives:
>      7. value
>     8. label
>     9. output
>    10. rating
>  However, we decided that earl:outcome was still the best option and  
> decided to adopt it unless someone comes up with a better suggestion. If  
> you have concerns about the new term earl:outcome, then please send a  
> rationale and alternate suggestions to the ERT list by 10 January 2007.

Sigh. Well, the outcome seems reasonable enough to me.

Cheers

Chaals


-- 
   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 15:33:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT