W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > December 2006

Antw: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 20 December, 2006

From: Daniela Ortner <Daniela.Ortner@jku.at>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:41:37 +0100
Message-Id: <4587DE00.EEEA.0037.0@jku.at>
To: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Regrets (especially as I am one of the two possible scribes),
I am already on Christmas vacation.
Daniela


>>> Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> 12/19/06 12:19  >>>

ERT WG,

The next teleconference is scheduled for Wednesday 20 December, 2006
from 15:00 to 16:00 UTC:
   * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PST)
   * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (EST)
   * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (CET)
   * 02:00 to 03:00 (Thursday) Australian Eastern Time
Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise
date for your own time zone:
   <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>

The teleconference information is:
   * +1-617-761-6200
   * Passcode 3794 ("ERWG")
   * IRC server irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #er

Next on the scribe rotation list is: Charles or Daniela
   <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/scribes>


AGENDA:

1. announcements and planning
  + 1.a. HTTP Vocabulary in RDF publication
   - news about the first Working Draft publication

  + 1.b. confirm date for upcoming face-to-face
   <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Dec/0077>
   - current proposal: 22-23 February 2007 in Gijon, Spain

  + 1.c. joint WAI testing meeting
   <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Dec/0087>
   - upcoming meeting: 24 January 2007 in Boston, USA

  + 1.d. extending ERT WG Charter
   <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Dec/0097>
   - please review and send any questions or comments

2. alternate for earl:validity
  <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Dec/0088>
  - decide on an alternative term for earl:validity

3. addressing warnings in EARL
  <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Dec/0075>
  - decide on one of the following:
   A. drop the idea of warnings in EARL completely
   B. adopt a simple literal earl:warning property
   C. adopt a more comprehensive earl:Warning class


Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 11:42:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT