W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2005

Re: EARL Schema resorted and with OWL constraints

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Message-ID: <42A9C65B.8040501@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org


Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> I think this is making statements about foaf:Person - if the owl:Thing  
> were anonymous, of rdf:type foaf:Person then we would be OK.


> As a new comment, we should only insist on at least one of foaf:mbox or  
> foaf:mbox_sha1

Adding mbox as required and sha1 as optional (additionally) for now. Let's discuss.

>> Agree with the minCardinality part (version info should be optional).  
>> However, how can a tool have more than one version?
> Well, Hera has 2 versions. Microsoft Word has dozens. Opera has hundreds...

One instance of a tool that is generating the EARL (or being used by an evaluator) has more than one version at the same time? Do you mean internal vs public version ID?

Anyhow, let's see what Sandor comes up with, maybe the framework he finds supports what you are talking about anyway...

> Right. I think it is important to keep that. I also think the  
> mincardinality should be 0, not 1.

Let's go through each of the constraints on the call...


Shadi Abou-Zahra,     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
Chair and Team Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),           http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
WAI-TIES Project,                 http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,     http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles -- 06560, Sophia-Antipolis -- France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64           Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 
Received on Friday, 10 June 2005 16:57:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:52 UTC