- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:16:22 +0200
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > <d:description r:parseType="Literal"> > <p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a > href="http://example.org/tests">Automated Test Cases</a> 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, > 10 all passed. No regression problems.</p> </d:description> added. > Do these approaches break anything? Yes, I think it misses the fact that the different tests may have different earl:messages. Apart from that, it's a neat way of summarizing "same results". Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra, Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES) http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2005 16:16:32 UTC