W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Verbose reporting

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:16:22 +0200
Message-ID: <429F30D6.7000500@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Hi,

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>     <d:description r:parseType="Literal">
>     <p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a  
> href="http://example.org/tests">Automated Test Cases</a> 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 
> 10  all passed. No regression problems.</p>

</d:description> added.


> Do these approaches break anything?

Yes, I think it misses the fact that the different tests may have different earl:messages. Apart from that, it's a neat way of summarizing "same results".

Regards,
  Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra,       Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),             http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),      http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES)     http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64             Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2005 16:16:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:25 GMT