W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > July 2005

Re: Formalization of rule 91

From: Vicente Luque Centeno <vlc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 21:49:40 +0200 (CEST)
To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507042125240.22412@violin.it.uc3m.es>

On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Chris Ridpath wrote:

>> Anyway, and coming back to our example, is there a better way to have both 
>> link and label functionality sepparately? My answer is: only if the title 
>> attribute (of the input) is used instead of a label.
> Your example could be confusing to the user because the label serves 2 
> purposes - link and label.

Not my example, but yours is the one which is confusing. I did not nest 
labels and links. I just said WHY I DID NOT use labels in my example. 
Labels and links were nested at your example at:
http://checker.atrc.utoronto.ca/docs/Resource%20booking.htm remember ;-)?

> We needed the same functionality as shown in your 
> example and had to use to pieces of text - one is the control label and one 
> is the link. Like this:
> http://checker.atrc.utoronto.ca/servlet/ChangeGuideline?lang=eng

That is right, but not the thing I want (remember that I wanted to add a 
lot of "resources" and I don't want to have a double text for each). 
That's why I preferred using the title attribute.

Please, take notice that:

1.- http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test57.html says that 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/testfiles/57-3.html passes the test, 
so I assume that as long a a title attribute is provided, labels, though 
recommended, are not required. That's why I added the [not(@title)] part 
in my XQuery expressions.

2.- Your example at 
http://checker.atrc.utoronto.ca/servlet/ChangeGuideline?lang=eng fails 
with http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test197.html (lots of "(view 
details)" links pointing to different targets ;-) ???!!!!

3,. You should validate 
http://checker.atrc.utoronto.ca/servlet/ChangeGuideline?lang=eng with 
itself (it does not right now) ;-)

4.- I will test your validator. :-)

Received on Monday, 4 July 2005 19:49:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:53 UTC