Updated. Johannes Koch wrote: > > Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >> <rdf:RDF xmlns:earl="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#" >> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" >> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/#"> > > [..] > >> <earl:TestCase rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#wc-priority-1"> >> <dc:title>Priority 1 Checkpoints</dc:title> >> <dc:description rdf:parseType="Literal">A Web content developer >> <strong>must</strong> satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more >> groups will find it impossible to access information in the document. >> Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for some groups to >> be able to use Web documents.</dc:description> > > [...] > > Shouldn't there be a namespace declaration for unprefixed (XHTML?) > elements? -- Shadi Abou-Zahra, Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe Chair and Team Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 2004, Route des Lucioles -- 06560, Sophia-Antipolis -- France Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT