Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <rdf:RDF xmlns:earl="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#" > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/#"> [..] > <earl:TestCase rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#wc-priority-1"> > <dc:title>Priority 1 Checkpoints</dc:title> > <dc:description rdf:parseType="Literal">A Web content developer <strong>must</strong> satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups will find it impossible to access information in the document. Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for some groups to be able to use Web documents.</dc:description> [...] Shouldn't there be a namespace declaration for unprefixed (XHTML?) elements? -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628Received on Monday, 22 August 2005 10:32:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT