W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Against (current) test 48 (document's language)

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:24:14 +0200
Message-ID: <42F740DE.7020702@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
[HTML WCAG 2.0 test 48]
> Yes, but it is not the ERT groups place to tell WCAG what it should be  
> testing for. Only how to test it.

1. Where does the WCAG WG say, that it is only the lang attribute you 
have to test for?

2. I think, whether to include @xml:lang where appropriate into the 
test, would be the responsibility of this joint task force. Do you think 
it's only WCAG Techniques TF responsibility?

3. The HTML Techniques and the HTML test suite cover HTML and XHTML 1.0, 
as mentioned in the Abstract, not e.g. XHTML 1.1, XHTML Basic 1.0 or 
even XHTML 2.0, although, the procedure for test 48 mentions "XHTML 1.1 
or higher". So either the test suite is about HTML, XHTML 1.0 and 
upwards, then the procedure should be rephrased to "4. If the content is 
XHTML based on XHTML modularization ..." (which would include XHTML 
Basic 1.0), or the fourth item should be removed.
-- 
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 11:24:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT