W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Questions about the testCaseDescription tag

From: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:03:03 +0200
Message-ID: <1161428583.4539fe67d531e@webmail2.kuleuven.be>
To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Hi Shane, All,

Quoting Shane Anderson <shane@cpd2.usu.edu>:
> Hi
> 
> A few simple questions / clarifications on the testCaseDescription
> tag:
> <testCaseDescription id=""
> xml:lang="en"
> xmlns="http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/"
> xmlns:btw="http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/"
> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
> xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
> xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
> xmlns:earl="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/
> http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/tcdl2.0.xsd
> http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
> http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
> http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xhtml/xhtml1-strict.xsd
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink
> http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/xlink.xsd"
> >

Something I overlooked is that we also need the RDF namespace for the 
rdf:datatype attributes on EARL pointers.


> Is there a pattern an author should follow when creating an 
> id for our purposes in this work group?

Yes, that would be the naming convention described at 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL#chapt-conventions.


> Currently the schema for TCDL exist at a BenToWeb address.
> Will this change to a W3C address once we have hammered out
> an acceptable product? I am assuming that there will be
> a W3C version of TCDL when we are finished.

The task force uses TCDL (developed by the BenToWeb project) to avoid 
the long process of creating a language from scratch. Hosting TCDL at a 
W3C address would be interpreted by many as a kind of endorsement, and 
there has been some pressure to avoid the impression of endorsement. 
For a W3C version of TCDL, it would be necessary to find a working 
group who wants to add the work on such a language to its charter.
But regardless of whether there will be a W3C version, I always want to 
hear about things you don't like about TCDL.

Best regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Saturday, 21 October 2006 11:03:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:33 GMT