W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Location of 'techniques' in TCDL

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:45:13 +0200
Message-ID: <453613C9.20605@w3.org>
To: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Cc: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org


cstrobbe wrote:
> Putting 'techniques' inside 'locations' sounds like a 'neither fish, 
> flesh, nor good red herring'-solution

Now that mention herrings, I don't really understand why techniques is 
not part of the rule set. The thing that the test is testing for is 
actually the technique, the success criteria is secondary to that. Do we 
need to revisit the schema for rule sets?

> if we care about the 
> relationship between technique(s) and location(s), why not put 
> 'techniques' inside 'location'; if we don't care, why not put 
> 'techniques' outside 'locations' and avoid suggesting a relationship 
> between a specific location and a specific technique? Let's take a 
> clear stance, not something in between.

Agreed. I for my part care... ;)


Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2006 11:45:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:06:00 UTC