W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > October 2006

RE: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 3 October

From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:06:54 +0200
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA52188281901629C49@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "cstrobbe" <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>, <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>

 

Regrets for tomorrow's conference due to "Fundamentos Web 2006"
I have sent previously to the list my concerns about previous versions of TCDL (version E), some of them still relevant.

Regards,
 CI.

 
--------------------------------------

Carlos Iglesias

CTIC Foundation
Science and Technology Park of Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain 

phone: +34 984291212
fax: +34 984390612
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org




> AGENDA:
> 1. Continue discussion on TCDL (version F) per section [1] 2. 
> Start of test production phase
> 
> 
> The following changes were made since the previous draft of TCDL:
> * 'date' was changed to 'dc:date' [2],
> * 'description' was changed to 'dc:description' [2],
> * the TCDL example in Appendix B was updated,
> * 'dc:contributor' was moved between 'dc:creator' and 
> 'dc:date' to avoid ambiguity in the content model of 'formalMetadata',
> * another example of 'rules' was added (with a 'technique' element),
> * 'location' can now have any attributes and elements in the 
> EARL namespace.
> 
> 
> Some cleanup is still necessary. Other things that still need to be
> done:
> * The document on "Metadata Used by the Task Force" still 
> needs to be created.
> * "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF" is mentioned in the secion on 
> 'httpRequest' 
> but the schema has not changed here.
> * There is no mechanism yet to refer to EARL reports.
> 
> 
> [1] http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/
> XML Schema: http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/tcdl2.0.xsd
> 
> [2] This change has certain implications because of the data 
> types: in instance documents, it will be necessary to 
> reference the data type:
> <dc:date xsi:type="btw:btwDate">2009-09-29</dc:date> (see the 
> example in Appendix B). Without xsi:type, there appeared to 
> be no way to ensure validation.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Carlos Velasco and Christophe Strobbe
> 
> 
> --
> Christophe Strobbe
> K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research 
> Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 
> 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
> tel: +32 16 32 85 51
> http://www.docarch.be/ 
> 
> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 17:07:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:33 GMT