W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > October 2006

Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 3 October

From: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:51:10 +0200
Message-ID: <1159793470.45210b3ebbba9@webmail2.kuleuven.be>
To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Dear TSD TF participants,

The next teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday 3 October 2006
from 12:30 to 13:30 UTC:
 * 05:30 to 06:30 North American Pacific Time (PST)
 * 08:30 to 09:30 North American Eastern Time (EST)
 * 14:30 to 15:30 Central European Time (CET)
 * 00:30 to 01:30 (Wednesday) Australian Eastern Time

Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise
date for your own time zone:
  <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>

Next on the scribe rotation list is: Michael
  <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/scribes#scribes-tsd>

The teleconference information is:
 * +1-617-761-6200
 * Passcode 8783 ("TSTF")
 * IRC server irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #tsdtf


AGENDA:
1. Continue discussion on TCDL (version F) per section [1]
2. Start of test production phase


The following changes were made since the previous draft of TCDL:
* 'date' was changed to 'dc:date' [2],
* 'description' was changed to 'dc:description' [2],
* the TCDL example in Appendix B was updated,
* 'dc:contributor' was moved between 'dc:creator' and 'dc:date' to 
avoid ambiguity in the content model of 'formalMetadata',
* another example of 'rules' was added (with a 'technique' element),
* 'location' can now have any attributes and elements in the EARL 
namespace.


Some cleanup is still necessary. Other things that still need to be 
done:
* The document on "Metadata Used by the Task Force" still needs to be 
created.
* "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF" is mentioned in the secion on 'httpRequest' 
but the schema has not changed here.
* There is no mechanism yet to refer to EARL reports.


[1] http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/
XML Schema: http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/tcdl2.0.xsd

[2] This change has certain implications because of the data types: in 
instance documents, it will be necessary to reference the data type:
<dc:date xsi:type="btw:btwDate">2009-09-29</dc:date> (see the example 
in Appendix B). Without xsi:type, there appeared to be no way to ensure 
validation.


Best regards,
Carlos Velasco and Christophe Strobbe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 12:51:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:33 GMT