- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:26:04 +0100
- To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Cc: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi Carlos, Carlos Iglesias wrote: > * contact information of the submitter is available; > > Where is supposed to be recorded this information? Good question. > * all necessary files follow the naming conventions; > > There is a "testfile" subdirectory for the test > sample content and a "metadata" subdirectory for the > metadata, but the proposed name in the usage document > for the test sample content is "content" instead of > "testfile" Ouch! We may need to change that back to "testfile" in the usage document, or live with an abandoned subdirectory. > Additionally the test sample makes use of embedded > scripting, should this have been externalized under a > script subdirectory? Good point. > * all necessary files are valid in their use; > > What is this suppose to mean? Are we talking about > grammar validation? Sometimes files will be intentionally invalid according to the formal grammar so we can't say that all test files must be valid. What would be a better wording? Maybe "no unintentional validity errors" as we did with broken links? > Additionally there is a "requiredTests" element which > is not part of the Metadata Vocabulary Do we allow extra data in the metadata or not? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 13:26:28 UTC