W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > December 2006

Re: sc2.5.1_l1_003 step 2: Structure review

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:26:15 +0100
Message-ID: <458696F7.1030501@w3.org>
To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Cc: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Hi Carlos,

Thanks for completing your action items! I think you've shown a couple 
of inconsistencies and issues with the checklists that we need to 
discuss on the teleconference and update.

Do you have other observations or ideas from carrying out these reviews? 
Approximately how long did each review take? Do you have ideas for 
improving the process and reducing the effort needed for reviews?

Regards,
   Shadi


Carlos Iglesias wrote:
> 
> Hi group,
> 
> As per my action item from the last teleconference here we have the structure review (step 2) of the third test sample with some comments 
> 
> * contact information of the submitter is available; (see comments to the previous test sample)
> * all necessary files are committed and available;
> 
> The metadata file is not well-formed
> The test sample content is not functional (not being interpreted at the server)
> 
> * all necessary files follow the naming conventions; (see comments to the previous test sample)
> * all necessary files are valid in their use; (see comments to the previous test sample)
> * there are no unintentional broken links; OK
> * all the metadata restrictions are applied, for example:
> 	o dates and other values use the correct format; OK
>       o copyright notices and other values are correct;
> 
> The test sample content includes copyright information that is different from the metadata copyright information 
> 
>       o titles, description, and other texts are correct; OK
>       o identifiers exist and have the correct syntax; OK
>       o techniques and locations are referenced correctly;
> 	
> Apparently the locations refer to the server-side language not to the generated content. Is this what we expect?
> 
>       o location pointers are consistent with each other; OK.
> 
> 
> Initial content review can't be done since the example is not functional
> 
> Regards,
>  CI.
> 
> --------------------
> Carlos Iglesias
> 
> CTIC Foundation
> Science and Technology Park of Gijón
> 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain
> 
> phone: +34 984291212
> fax: +34 984390612
> email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
> URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org 
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 13:26:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:34 GMT