- From: <michaeka@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:21:52 -0600
- To: <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
Hello, all - My comments are below Carol's. Shawn said: >Based on feedback from heuristic reviews, I made the following additional >changes in the prototype (http://www.w3.org/2004/09/wai-nav/): >* changed static navigation links to: > - WAI Translations > - Contacting WAI > - WAI Site Help > - WAI Site Map > - W3C Search >specific question: WAI Site Help & WAI Site Map too similar? What about >something like, "Help on WAI Site" Yes I think they are too similar - though it doesn't help that visually in the email they are listed on top of each other. I know we've gone back and forth on this, but I think it would be ok to remove WAI from all of these names. There could be confusion by users, but I don't think so. The most important one that we need to be specific about is the Search. Looking at Search again I recommend we rename it: "Search W3C Sites". That way it is clear that it is not a search of only WAI or sites other than WAI, but that since WAI is a W3C site, it is included in the search. ____________AGREE with Carol, though would keep "WAI" in first item - some clarity needed there. Links could be: - WAI Translations - Contact Us - Site Help - Site Map - Search W3C Sites >* bumped "Guidelines & Techniques" up a level, so top level is now: > - Getting Started > - About WAI > - Guidelines & Techniques > - Supporting Resources > - WAI Groups ... How about just "Resources"? I don't think the word "Supporting" helps the description. It seems redundant - resources by definition hopefully are supportive. ____________AGREE with Carol. "Supporting" implies that these Resources support something else, and in the order of the links I would assume they support the guidelines and techniques. They are not necessarily supportive, but are important in themselves. Blossom
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 17:36:29 UTC