W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org > October 2005

Re: first draft for good form page

From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:13:44 +0200
Message-Id: <A583280A-277A-4516-9915-61CE81DC4C82@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Cc: before & after WS <public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org>
To: tanguy lohéac <tanguy.loheac@snv.jussieu.fr>

Hi Tanguy, hi all.
I think it's important always to use the last specification that is  
wide adopted.
All browsers are XHTML 1.0 compliant.
I think we could transimt a better and more efficacious message if we  
show as realize a good and accessible site with XHTML and CSS; the  
new WAI site is XHTML 1.0 Transitional.

Il giorno 18/ott/05, alle ore 09:41, tanguy lohéac ha scritto:

> Hi Pasquale and all,
> To my mind it won't be meaningful to switch on another mark up  
> langugage for the good version. This would send a confusing message  
> toward the audience that it is necessaire to change the ml to make  
> an accessible version of the same page.
> What's your opinion ?
> Regards
> Tanguy
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pasquale Popolizio"  
> <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
> To: <shadi@w3.org>
> Cc: "tanguy lohéac" <tanguy.loheac@snv.jussieu.fr>; "before & after  
> WS" <public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 6:17 PM
> Subject: Re: first draft for good form page
>> Hi Shadi,
>> I completely agree with you about divs; I only suggest to use  
>> XHTML  1.0 Transitional, like new WAI site.
>> regards
>> ciao
>> pasquale
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2005 08:14:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:14 GMT