W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > February 2019

RE: Label, project, or milestone

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:19:25 +0000
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5941EAB8802D6745A7D363D7B37BD1F7AD8F8A30@bgb01xud1012>
+1 to milestones for triaging into target versions e.g. process2019, process2020 etc. They're the right tool for the job, IMO.

Labels are still useful for categorising as editorial/substantive/pr open/[whatever] though.

Nigel


________________________________________
From: Florian Rivoal [florian@rivoal.net]
Sent: 13 February 2019 16:28
To: W3C Process CG
Subject: Label, project, or milestone

During the call today, I proposed using Github Projects instead of Github Labels to triage bugs into things we want to address during Process 2020 vs things we've agreed to defer to Process 2021. Chris (and a few others I think) suggested that maybe we should use Github Milestones instead.

I hadn't used them before, so I was a bit caught off guard, but having though about it, that makes sense to me.

Does anyone want to defend the use of Labels for this kind of triaging?

—Florian


-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 10:19:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 14 February 2019 10:19:57 UTC