W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > July 2017

Re: Draft Agenda Process Call July 12th, 9am Pacific

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:51:07 +0100
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3acdc84f-2afe-7c29-0b5c-f52bc843b121@tink.uk>
Regrets for this month.

With regard to issue #2 (joint deliverables), which is nominally 
assigned to me, +1 on running with Chaals' proposed editorial.




On 10/07/2017 19:13, David Singer wrote:
> WebEx: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m98a10c28e94ea2a2c76cedd389c26235
> meeting code: 640 650 903
> 
> Full Webex Information is on our Mail Archives <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2017Jul/0000.html>  (member only accessible)
> 
> IRC is #w3process
> 
> 1) Assign scribe, etc.
> 
> 2) Review any actions completed from the last call. Take up any discussions that are urgent.
>    See GitHub assigned issues <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/assigned/*>
> 
> 3) Active issues
> 
> see <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc> for issues sorted by recently-updated
> 
> 
> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/23> seems to have a proposal; act on it?
> 
> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/36> superseded specs; ask the AB to update the explanation page, and make any process edits needed to say that a request to mark as superseded can (should) be included in an AC ballot of the superseding spec.
> 
> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/2> joint deliverables: Chaals has a proposal; should we run with it?
> 
> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/30> specifically reference CEPC
> 
> 
> 4) Continue reviewing the issues in the GitHub Issue database <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues>, and
> 4.1) Tag the ones we intend to work on as ‘active’
> 4.2) deal with any minor clean-up (e.g. Chaals recently closed an issue on mention of CEPC), tag duplicates
> 4.3) for everything marked as ‘active’ , decide what the next steps are; ideally, have a champion (hello Mike) for it
> 
> I believe we handled 1-15 inclusive but omitted #11 (why?), so we’ll start with 11 and then move to 16 and following.
>    https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/11
>    https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/16
> 
> 5) Next meeting. Currently August 9th, 9am Pacific. BUT I CANNOT do this time. I either need a sub, a re-schedule, or a cancel.
> 
> 6) Any other business.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 
> 

-- 
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2017 07:51:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 11 July 2017 07:51:42 UTC