Re: Updated Editor's draft

On 7/10/2016 8:40 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've pushed a new Editor's draft of the Process, incorporating all the
> things I found as agreed.
>
> Roughly:
>
> Voting.
> I started at the start of the section that voting would be by STV. This
> also implies ranking - but there can still be ties. That simplified some
> of the changes.

Is this the same as the previously agreed to text?

https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/wiki/Voting2016

>
> Member Consortia
> I pretty much took the text.
>
> Appeals
> This is a big one. I pretty much took all the text, although there are a
> couple of places i tried to harmonise it better
>
> Supergroups - chartering to continue work
> The text I ended up with is between Dave's and Steve's. In particular, 
> for
> example, instead of inventing lots of terms about reference drafts or
> whatever I stated it as "for which an Exclusion Opportunity per Section 4
> of the Patent Policy has occurred" or something like that, with links.
>
> Obsoleting
> I pretty much took the text as written.
>
> I also changed the whitespace a lot, updated w3.org links to use https,
> and did some similar invisible tweaking. I noticed a couple of errors, 
> and
> some weird things, but they won't cause huge issues if we don't fix them
> all now.
>
> Comments welcome - detailed (diff-style) changelog is at
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/ and there is a changes summary in the 
> document:
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/cover.html#changes
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>

Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 16:13:43 UTC