W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2015

RE: [Issue-101] Replacement for the other of the diagrams in the Process document

From: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 03:50:47 +0000
To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BY1PR02MB1114802CEA45FCC9B28C8BD0AE360@BY1PR02MB1114.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
See below

From: Jeff Jaffe [mailto:jeff@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 6:20 PM
To: Stephen Zilles; public-w3process@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Issue-101] Replacement for the other of the diagrams in the Process document

Steve,

In CR, if there are substantial changes we stay in CR; but if there are very substantial changes we go back to WD.

Have we defined the difference between substantial changes and very substantial changes?
[SZ] No, IMO it is up to the WG to decide whether the changes would take a document out of CR. The most obvious reason would be that there need to be major implementation changes and, therefore, the document is not really ready for implementation (the anachronistic definition of CR) anymore. If the changes involve implementation tweeks and the participants agree that they should be made, then those are substantive, but not "very substantive". If you think putting in some text like that would be useful, it could be proposed
Steve Z


Jeff
On 10/5/2015 10:17 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote:

A proposed, revised replacement for diagram in sections 6.7 of the 2015 Process Document

  http://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#revised-rec

is attached.



Comments are welcome



Steve Z
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2015 03:51:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 October 2015 03:51:20 UTC