W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-129 - coordination groups

From: Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:12:05 +0000
To: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "Revising W3C Process Community Group" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1415981523032.11979@microsoft.com>
> regular meeting among chairs and not need a chunk of the Process document to describe it.
+1.  If some set of WGs want to put in their charters that their chairs will meet regularly to coordinate, that's fine, but in a more effective W3C, that information sharing and search for ways that work for both groups would happen between participants, and the chairs/team get involved only as needed to prevent deadlock.

More generally, we should be looking for ways to make coordination emerge "organically" from the process, culture, and tooling rather than make coordination yet another chokepoint or regular meeting.


________________________________________
From: chaals@yandex-team.ru <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 3:56 AM
To: Revising W3C Process Community Group
Subject: ISSUE-129 - coordination groups

If there is really only one coordination group and one person that wants it, maybe it could become a regular meeting among chairs and not need a chunk of the Process document to describe it.

As a Task Force co-ordinator, I am asked to attend both a regular planning meeting, and from time to time ad hoc meetings. This seems a perfectly reasonable thing to do without a chapter in the Process document telling me to do so.

cheers

Chaals

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 16:12:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC