W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > June 2014

Re: On Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting"

From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:25:28 -0700
Message-ID: <5399C668.2090300@linux.intel.com>
To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>

On 2014-06-11 07:34, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:22:49 +0200, Wayne Carr 
> <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>> This is a suggestion to the AB to ask for an AC poll on using Schulze
>> STV one time for the next TAG election. (or the next cycle, TAG and AB,
>> if proponents prefer that).
>
> Formally, this requires a change to the Process. I don't think it is a 
> complex change, if there is clear consensus for it, but it may be a 
> difficult way to get information. And drawing a lot of conclusions 
> from a single election is limited by the circumstances of the 
> individual election.

OK, I withdraw the suggestion.

>
> I don't object to the idea, and would support it, but I would like us 
> to have more longitudinal data too, which is why I think collecting 
> better data over a series of elections would *probably* be more useful.
>
> (I'm still thinking about all this - at some point I will look for a 
> CfC when I have a clear question that I think is the right one, but 
> others are welcome to make one in the meantime. I'll send a different 
> message about 'process' in this group to clarify people can do it).
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 15:25:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:11 UTC