- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:17:41 -0400
- To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Hi, As chair of this community group, in principle I get to decide what are group decisions. I'd like us to work on fairly democratic principles, so I suggest the following strawman: + anyone who wants a decision declared by the CG can make a call for consensus. + it should be proposed in an email, with "CfC" or "call for consensus" in the subject line. + there should be a clear statement of the resolution that will be adopted, assuming it achieves consensus. I.e. there should be a literal statement. + the time allowed for response should be at least two weeks. + discussion of the proposal should not be in the same thread as saying "I agree", or "I disagree", or "I abstain" - to make it easy to determine what is an actual "vote". + at the end of the time available for response, I will declare a consensus, or a large majority, if one is apparent. There are some questions I have. The most obvious one is that I think we should record all decisions in a common place. Wiki works for me as a suggestion, but does anyone else have one? We could also use the tracker, or some other mechanism if anyone thinks we really should. Comments? thoughts? cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 14:18:15 UTC