W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:02:29 -0700
Cc: "jicheu@yahoo.fr" <jicheu@yahoo.fr>, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>, W3C Members <w3c-ac-forum@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Message-id: <119C5AE6-73CD-47DD-A193-DBDFD507E327@apple.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>

On Aug 7, 2014, at 12:27 , Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com> wrote:

> On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:44 PM, Jean-Charles (JC) Verdiť <jicheu@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>> I am all in favor of more openness (when/where it makes sense)
>> I am all opposed to carrying misleading information.
> I think it'd be pretty difficult to suggest we want to be more open while rejecting a new CG on the sole basis that its name *can* be interpreted as a criticism.

I canít connect this, so that means I canít work out (I think) what you think the definition of Ďopení is.  Can you explain a little more?

Open, to me, means that the group is accessible to anyone, and that people can track its work, comment if they like, and even make proposals for work etc.  I cannot see any link to the management of reasonable titles for community groups at all.

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 21:03:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:11 UTC