W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]]

From: Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié <jicheu@yahoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 08:33:03 +0200
Message-ID: <53E31D9F.8070902@yahoo.fr>
To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>
CC: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, "ab@w3.org" <ab@w3.org>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Hi Virginie & all,

GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> Dear all,
> That conversation is a great example of confusion : we are discussing AB organization on a public mailing list dedicated to Process Community Group and only W3C members are actively participating, copying AB-only mailing list. I suggest we quickly go for making decision in the AB for mailing list creation and scope...
> - ab only list --> done
> - ab public list --> to be created

I still oppose to a "public" AB list. Public has no reason nor interest
to look into internal organisation details or administrative matters.

Regards
JC


> - ab-member list --> to be created
> 
> Jeff,
> Do you think you have enough elements to trigger a call for consensus on the AB-only mailing list about that topic?
> (Or should it be Chaals as chair of the process community group who should be conducting that decision ? sorry, trolling here ;)  )
> 
> Regards,
> Virginie
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié" [mailto:jicheu@yahoo.fr]
> Sent: vendredi 1 août 2014 23:01
> To: David Singer
> Cc: GALINDO Virginie; Stephen Zilles; Chris Wilson; Arthur Barstow; ab@w3.org; Revising W3C Process Community Group
> Subject: Re: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]]
> 
> David Singer wrote:
>>  It's pretty rare for the general public to be interested in the internals of governance, and also rare for organizations to expose their governance discussions.
> 
> +1. I can't see any benefit neither for the consortium nor for the public.
> 
> Regards
> JC
> 
> ________________________________
>  This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 06:33:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:11 UTC