W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]]

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:28:28 +0200
To: "jicheu@yahoo.fr" <jicheu@yahoo.fr>, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "Chris Wilson" <cwilso@google.com>, "Stephen Zilles" <szilles@adobe.com>, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>, "GALINDO Virginie" <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>
Cc: "ab@w3.org" <ab@w3.org>, "Revising W3C Process Community Group" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xj34lqs7y3oazb@chaals>
On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:25:37 +0200, GALINDO Virginie  
<Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
> That conversation is a great example of confusion : we are discussing AB  
> organization on a public mailing list dedicated to Process Community  
> Group

The internal communication mechanisms and confidentiality of the W3C is a  
matter of Process, and therefore in principle a reasonable topic for this  
group to discuss.

> and only W3C members are actively participating, copying AB-only mailing  
> list.

One reason not to cross-post to list is that people confuse the  
confidentiality levels, leading to inappropriate posting of material to  
those for whom it was never intended.

> I suggest we quickly go for making decision in the AB for mailing list  
> creation and scope...
> - ab only list --> done
> - ab public list --> to be created
> - ab-member list --> to be created
>
> Jeff,
> Do you think you have enough elements to trigger a call for consensus on  
> the AB-only mailing list about that topic?
> (Or should it be Chaals as chair of the process community group who  
> should be conducting that decision ? sorry, trolling here ;)  )

If the CG (or for that matter the AC) want to request that the AB do  
something, they are welcome to do so. However the way things are  
structured, whether the AB follows any given request is entirely up to  
them.

cheers

chaals

> Regards,
> Virginie
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié" [mailto:jicheu@yahoo.fr]
> Sent: vendredi 1 août 2014 23:01
> To: David Singer
> Cc: GALINDO Virginie; Stephen Zilles; Chris Wilson; Arthur Barstow;  
> ab@w3.org; Revising W3C Process Community Group
> Subject: Re: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re:  
> w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all  
> non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]]
>
> David Singer wrote:
>>  It's pretty rare for the general public to be interested in the  
>> internals of governance, and also rare for organizations to expose  
>> their governance discussions.
>
> +1. I can't see any benefit neither for the consortium nor for the  
> public.
>
> Regards
> JC
>
> ________________________________
>  This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees  
> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or  
> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable  
> for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the  
> intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the  
> sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission  
> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a  
> transmitted virus.
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 09:29:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:11 UTC