- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:32:18 +0100
- To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:20:51 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > Also, we don't have to make it a cost-only operation: this > modularization work sounds like a very good opportunity for someone that > doesn't feel like tackling all the most thorny issues that editors have > to deal with to get more familiar with the spec editing role, get to > interact with the specialists in the space, etc. 1. We have been asking for people to do this since before the HTML WG started. Nothing has come out of that thus far. Until someone proves otherwise (and it's close to a decade now) those are non-existent resources. 2. Modularizing a part of HTML (or anything really) is actually a rather complicated procedure that requires detailed understanding of how all the pieces fit together. That is why thus far only experienced editors (with time) have demonstrated the feasibility. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 20:32:57 UTC