- From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:34:39 +0100
- To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
I think it is simply due to the idea that CGs are not meant to produce a recommendation from the onset. This was done make entry for potential participants easier. Rec track can come later, by transitioning into a WG at which point regular process applies. > Anyone know why there aren't disclosure obligations for Member of CGs? > (why members of a CG don't have personal knowledge disclosure > requirements similar to those for any W3C member reading any TR draft.) -- Kai
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 08:36:21 UTC