- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:27:08 -0500
- To: ext Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- CC: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 3/6/12 7:16 AM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> Proposed solution #2 -> drop the PP for WGs and move WGs to use the >> CG patent policies > > If we don't have agreement to get to "finished", that still causes > problems... Sorry but I don't understand what you mean here so I would appreciate it if you would please elaborate. -Thanks, ArtB > the CG process has some benefits, but also some drawbacks.
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 12:28:09 UTC