W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > November 2011

Re: member only activity

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:08:20 +1300
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <20111115200820.GA7380@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2011-11-15 13:27 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:22:35 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 15, 2011, at 13:19 , Steve Faulkner wrote:
> >>Case in point: I am a member of the protocols and formats
> >>working group which works mainly in the member space. I think it
> >>would benefit from people outside the W3C member space  having
> >>access technical discussion archives and meeting minutes.
> >
> >Aren't most groups chartered to be public these days? It certainly
> >seems to me that PFWG would be a prime candidate for that. I'm
> >guessing it's probably member-only because it's an old group.
> It was rechartered somewhat recently
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/charter201006 and was kept W3C Member-only
> because of unspecified Members wanted it to be so, if memory serves
> me. @mattur on twitter keeps track of those matters better than I
> do.

During the rechartering in June-August 2010, Mozilla did formally
object to the PFWG operating in member space, but I think I failed
to reply to followup emails quickly enough to keep the objection in


𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 20:09:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:07 UTC