Simon, 2015-05-08 0:36 GMT-03:00 <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>: > Phil - > > I took a look through the Community Groups, and found > https://www.w3.org/community/perma-id/# > which it appears you are/were involved in. AFAICT the outcome of that work > is > http://w3id.org/ > which hosts redirects, and is intended to do this indefinitely. So anyone > who has a resource-set (including a list of definitions) for which they > would like a neutral/persistent baseURI, can request a directory (by > issuing a pull-request), and hope it is approved by the administrators. > Have I got it? > > Thanks! You find a good initiative/community that (looks to) fit with the "URN as code" for SchemaOrg demands... Only to confirm: the suggestion is to use w3id.org as baseURI of URNs and URN-Resolvers? > Schema.org already has a small presence. > > If SchemaOrg evolves in this direction, what the strategy? Perhaps we need first to do some homework ;-) (I am starting to do mine here <https://github.com/ppKrauss/standard-URNs>) > The technology is rather trivial - it is the intention which matters. > yes > But it looks like a lighter-weight alternative to http://w3.org/ns - > though governance is currently rather informal. > > yes, better alternative... Perhaps with SchemaOrg participation, some curatory aspects can be formalized. PPKraussReceived on Saturday, 9 May 2015 22:01:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 9 May 2015 22:01:37 UTC