W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > March 2015

RE: Proposal for Schema.org extension mechanism

From: <David.Newman@wellsfargo.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:55:02 +0000
To: <guha@google.com>, <ehs@pobox.com>
CC: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4A8ED596F5DBE641A37B8C26628ADE5043B3085A@MSGEXOXM9127.ent.wfb.bank.corp>
Hi Guha,

I am new to this thread but do support your proposal.   FYI, we have started a working group to develop financial content based on FIBO to contribute to schema.org<http://schema.org/>.  We would therefore develop an extension e.g. fibo.schema.org<http://fibo.schema.org/>  to encapsulate and organize related financial concepts that might not necessarily fit within the schema.org<http://schema.org/> core.

Best,

David Newman
Strategic Planning Manager
Senior Vice President
Enterprise Architecture and IT Strategy
David.Newman@wellsfargo.com<mailto:David.Newman@wellsfargo.com>
Office: (415) 801-8418
Cell:    (925) 788-0529

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein.  If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.

From: Guha [mailto:guha@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 5:21 PM
To: Ed Summers
Cc: W3C Vocabularies
Subject: Re: Proposal for Schema.org extension mechanism

I agree that we do have to look out for this.

I trust you will all keep us honest and make sure that what needs to go into the core does go into the core.

guha

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com<mailto:ehs@pobox.com>> wrote:
Hi Guha,

> On Mar 19, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Guha <guha@google.com<mailto:guha@google.com>> wrote:
>
> We would like to proceed with the implementation of this proposal. If there are strong objections, now would be the right time to raise them.

I’m still not convinced that the middle category (reviewed vocabularies) will be good for schema.org<http://schema.org> and web publishers. I am concerned that it will mean less work is done to integrate extensions into the core, and schema.org<http://schema.org> will become difficult to navigate and understand as a whole.

Luckily you don’t need to convince me to proceed with your plan :-)

//Ed

Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 01:01:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 20 March 2015 01:01:13 UTC