Re: Proposal for Schema.org extension mechanism

Excellent! In fact fibo was used as a motivating example for the extension
mechanism in many a discussion!

guha

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:55 PM, <David.Newman@wellsfargo.com> wrote:

>  Hi Guha,
>
>
>
> I am new to this thread but do support your proposal.   FYI, we have
> started a working group to develop financial content based on FIBO to
> contribute to schema.org.  We would therefore develop an extension e.g.
> fibo.schema.org  to encapsulate and organize related financial concepts
> that might not necessarily fit within the schema.org core.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> David Newman
>
> Strategic Planning Manager
>
> Senior Vice President
>
> Enterprise Architecture and IT Strategy
>
> David.Newman@wellsfargo.com
>
> Office: (415) 801-8418
>
> Cell:    (925) 788-0529
>
>
>
> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If
> you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
> you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message
> or any information herein.  If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> message.  Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>
> *From:* Guha [mailto:guha@google.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2015 5:21 PM
> *To:* Ed Summers
> *Cc:* W3C Vocabularies
> *Subject:* Re: Proposal for Schema.org extension mechanism
>
>
>
> I agree that we do have to look out for this.
>
>
>
> I trust you will all keep us honest and make sure that what needs to go
> into the core does go into the core.
>
>
>
> guha
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Guha,
>
> > On Mar 19, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Guha <guha@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > We would like to proceed with the implementation of this proposal. If
> there are strong objections, now would be the right time to raise them.
>
> I’m still not convinced that the middle category (reviewed vocabularies)
> will be good for schema.org and web publishers. I am concerned that it
> will mean less work is done to integrate extensions into the core, and
> schema.org will become difficult to navigate and understand as a whole.
>
> Luckily you don’t need to convince me to proceed with your plan :-)
>
> //Ed
>
>
>