W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Reintroducing the Music proposal

From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:55:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOr1obFyAoQ1D489EFF-47wP6csZFYSXGTXE3MzSpkwK6cBAAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> byArtist is a bad name for the performer, as the name of the relation could
> just as easily mean composer or lyricist.
>

I agree, but it existed before this proposal and I didn't want to break
existing markup.



>
> Is composer specific to the music or a composition or does it also include
> lyricists?
>
> How is "music and lyrics by" to be represented?
>
>
As Karen said:
music by: composer
lyrics by: lyricist




> Are composer and lyricist subproperties of creator or author?
>
> How should the various other values for creators, e.g., Traditional, be
> represented?
>
>
They should be subproperties of creator. I would like to eventually address
author vs creator, but tackling all of CreativeWork is daunting.



> The ranges of several properties are different when they probably should be
> the same.
> byArtist - MusicGroup
> composer - Organization or Person
> lyricist - Person
> Quite a few lyrics of popular songs are credited to a music group as a
> whole.
>
>
Noted on lyricist.

The existing MusicGroup (which is used extensively) is odd. It inherits
from Organization, but the definition states "Can also be a solo musician"
and authors in fact label Paul McCartney as a Music Group.

We could extend the range of byArtist to be MusicGroup or Person to make
the semantics be the same for the properties without breaking the existing
markup. And maybe we can convince authors that Paul McCartney is not a
group. ;-)



> Are cover songs arrangements?  Are themes and variations arrangements?  Are
> parodies arrangements?  The description of musicArrangement is much too
> vague.
>

Many sources say no. For example, the Lemonheads cover of Mrs. Robinson
sounds very different than Paul Simon's, but according to MusicBrainz, it's
the same composition.



> The examples for musicCompositionForm should go beyond classical music, for
> example, power ballad.
>
>
I agree with Karen. Composition forms are not really well defined, which is
why I left it as text.





> MusicRecording is a bad name for a track.  There are tracks in albums that
> do not correspond to compositions, e.g., compositions split over multiple
> sides of an album, as for Thick as a Brick.  Going further back, many
> 8-track tapes split compositions into multiple tracks.
>
>
MusicRecording was the existing name. We needed the same type and I did not
want to break the existing markup.


- Vicki


Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 19:55:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC