W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Person job proposal (was Re: Schema.org proposal: Financial information)

From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:24:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOr1obGnEWWmkSeSoHSD9YdSsFMPtkvMEqf-WSRQJui1XGwk8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> Perhaps when we say a 'service' is a Product, we refer to a particular
> service activity/occurrence, whereas the type Service is for the longer
> term entity that does such things?

This was my thought. The Service class has no properties to describe price,
etc. I think those should remain in Product and we should think of the
service as a Product when discussing offers.

- Vicki

Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 12:25:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC