W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Person job proposal (was Re: Schema.org proposal: Financial information)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:08:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=5gw5AVkGhAPRX99X4hjrbSd8ptAwj8kSbmbG=_68TGUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Cc: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 20 September 2014 08:38, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
<martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2014, at 22:40, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Martin and Thad.
>> So... The rest of you looks at Product as if it is ProductOrService.
>> In that case (see it coming?): How does the rest of you look at Service?
> I suppose that "Service" was once added for some specific, but maybe only hypothetical use-case by one of the sponsors of schema.org.

I believe it came relatively late, in support of its subtype,
see http://blog.schema.org/2013/08/vocabulary-for-describing-civic-services.html

see also https://web.archive.org/web/20131210070108/http://schema.org/Service

Received on Saturday, 20 September 2014 08:08:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC