W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Schema.org proposal: New Actions and Actions contigent on an Offer

From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:10:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CADK2AU2Xmi90dygjE5+boAoLCbMDPAibK-jGB4zbXM+T=ngWYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
is 'notAvailableAtOrFrom' really needed, wouldn't the following work as
well?

Not Available in China

{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "WatchAction",
"target": "http://www.hulu.com/the­daily­show­with­jon­stewart",
"contingentOnOffer": {
"@type": "Offer",
"availability": "http://schema.org/False",
"availableAtOrFrom": {
"@type": "Country",
"name": "CHN"
}
}

2014-09-18 23:44 GMT+02:00 ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>:

> On 09/18/2014 10:43 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> > On 09/17/2014 11:21 PM, Vicki Tardif Holland wrote:
> >> And adding to Offer
> >> http://schema.org/notAvailableAtOrFrom
> > Whenever we change Offer I think we should check if it also makes sense
> > for Demand. Also looking at name of this property @|@ I would propose
> > considering some alternative solutions before committing to this one. I
> > have some suggestions but would prefer to share them in github PR (or
> Issue)
> I just suggested another pattern in:
> https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/125#issuecomment-56107865
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 22:11:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC