W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Adding a Job and/or Profession type (was Schema.org proposal: Financial information)

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:47:29 +0200
Message-ID: <541990F1.5080006@wwelves.org>
To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
CC: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 09/17/2014 03:30 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
> I would bundle all respective additions under a new type - e.g. schema:Occupation or schema:Job, likely as a subtype of schema:Action (or schema:Thing?).
why not Thing > Intangible > Occupation just like Role ?

i would stay careful with subtypes of schema:Action, especially if they
don't sound right with -Action sufix: OccupationAction, unless we talk
here about OccupyAction :D

> 
> Jobs are roles that individuals hold over certain periods of time. So let us not put job-related properties directly under schema:Person.
> 
> The terms and conditions and the compensation should be modeled via schema:Demand (for Job offers - someone seeking work to get done for money) and schema:Offer (for Job search / applications - someone offering labor for money) and its existing commercial properties.
> 
> So we would have
> 
> a) Job Search
> 
> schema:Person -> schema:makesOffer -> schema:Offer -> schema:itemOffered -> schema:Occupation
> 
> b) Job Offer
> 
> schema:Organization -> schema:seeks -> schema:Demand -> schema:itemOffered -> schema:Occupation
+1
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 13:49:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC