W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: ItemList proposal

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:28:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=50o9KDVFSGksa-xmw5ujh_8qVbZC3jK2Y35W6S2ZFkaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Cc: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 16 September 2014 22:21, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the omission of 'itemposition' is problematic in this case as there
> is no implied order. Which a breadcrumb definitely has. That's actually one
> of the things I think is wrong with the datavocabulary breadcrumb (as well
> as it generating multiple top level entities without any property to link
> them to the WebPage).
> Without 'itemposition' we'd have to revert to nesting elements to be able to
> preserve the order.

Yes, I meant to add those in after I got it working in RDFa, started
chatting w/ Stephane Corlosquet to that end, ... and then ran out of
tuesday. But yes, position is needed explicitly...

Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 22:28:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC