W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: ItemList proposal

From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:31:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CADK2AU0_nDmuHOUjW8xQwHmcpijXy_x96pn5P+KbDbFigjs7VA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
>
> "and then ran out of tuesday"


hehe, I can relate to that, NP.

2014-09-17 0:28 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>:

> On 16 September 2014 22:21, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I think the omission of 'itemposition' is problematic in this case as
> there
> > is no implied order. Which a breadcrumb definitely has. That's actually
> one
> > of the things I think is wrong with the datavocabulary breadcrumb (as
> well
> > as it generating multiple top level entities without any property to link
> > them to the WebPage).
> >
> > Without 'itemposition' we'd have to revert to nesting elements to be
> able to
> > preserve the order.
>
> Yes, I meant to add those in after I got it working in RDFa, started
> chatting w/ Stephane Corlosquet to that end, ... and then ran out of
> tuesday. But yes, position is needed explicitly...
>
> Dan
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 22:31:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC