W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: ItemList proposal

From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:12:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CADK2AU3xJNuWaVj=dWy++L+GdzSsubYrzpC8L-LVOM=X9sq+YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Why not just leave itemListElement the way it is. I know it's a clumsy name
but doesn't changing it just about any ItemList out there no longer is
correct?

2014-09-11 20:02 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>:

> On 11 September 2014 18:56, Jason Johnson (BING) <jasjoh@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > On second thought, re:  4.       "Change ‘itemListElement’ to
> ‘itemInList’", this could imply 'the list in which the item exists', which
> ideally we avoid.  I still want to eliminate usage of 'element' in the term
> but I'm open to suggestions on alternatives to 'itemInList'.
>
> "listedItem"? anyone got a better suggestion?
>
> BTW since last msg, I've updated
>
> https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/commit/96183f621e2d28ea11ed23c54e7d7993062b7e1d
> with examples hopefully now matching the drafted vocab, and
> http://sdo-itemlist.appspot.com/ItemList to match.
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 18:19:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC