Re: Mappings between schema.org and other vocabs (especially from W3C groups)

http://schema.rdfs.org/mappings.html lists:

* DBPedia
* DublinCore
* FOAF
* GoodRelations
* SIOC
* BIBO
* WordNet

( https://github.com/mhausenblas/schema-org-rdf/blob/master/mappings.html )


On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:10 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:

> Aloha,
>
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas#Introduction
> "In scope include collaborations on mappings, tools, extensibility and
> cross-syntax interoperability."
>
> Schema.org overlaps in many ways with other vocabularies, also those
> published under W3C namespace or currently under development in various
> W3C groups. Few examples:
>
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-activitystreams-vocabulary-20141023/
> * http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/core/
> * https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/payswarm.html
>
> I know about at least one effort of providing some mappings:
> http://schema.rdfs.org/
>
> Still as for today, If I publish data online using Activity Streams 2.0,
> which ~= schema.org/Action, search engines sponsoring schema.org will
> not understand it.
>
> Maybe we could put more emphasis in WebSchemas group on coordinating
> development of vocabularies, at least among various W3C groups, and try
> to eventually provide official mappings to schema.org which search
> engines could adopt in their own pace?
>
> We could take as a concrete use case Activity Streams 2.0 which we
> currently work on in Social WG. As I mentioned it maps almost directly
> to schema.org/Action
>
> Mahalo
>
>


-- 
Wes Turner
https://westurner.github.io/