Re: Mappings between schema.org and other vocabs (especially from W3C groups)

Note that, while this was a laudable activitity, it has not been updated since December, 2011 and also contains some bugs:

For instance, the rdfs:isDefinedBy triples for properties link to all types for which a property can be applied to, but should link to the ontology from which the element stem:

    rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://schema.org/Offer>;
    rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://schema.org/TypeAndQuantityNode>;
    rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://schema.org/Demand>;
    .

The scripts may still scrape parts of schema.org properly, but given all the activity in the past three years, I would not recommend to use http://schema.rdfs.org/ for serious projects without a careful investigation first.

Martin


-------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  martin.hepp@unibw.de
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/




On 03 Nov 2014, at 09:43, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://schema.rdfs.org/mappings.html lists:
> 
> * DBPedia
> * DublinCore
> * FOAF
> * GoodRelations
> * SIOC
> * BIBO
> * WordNet
> 
> ( https://github.com/mhausenblas/schema-org-rdf/blob/master/mappings.html )
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:10 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
> Aloha,
> 
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas#Introduction
> "In scope include collaborations on mappings, tools, extensibility and
> cross-syntax interoperability."
> 
> Schema.org overlaps in many ways with other vocabularies, also those
> published under W3C namespace or currently under development in various
> W3C groups. Few examples:
> 
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-activitystreams-vocabulary-20141023/
> * http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/core/
> * https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/payswarm.html
> 
> I know about at least one effort of providing some mappings:
> http://schema.rdfs.org/
> 
> Still as for today, If I publish data online using Activity Streams 2.0,
> which ~= schema.org/Action, search engines sponsoring schema.org will
> not understand it.
> 
> Maybe we could put more emphasis in WebSchemas group on coordinating
> development of vocabularies, at least among various W3C groups, and try
> to eventually provide official mappings to schema.org which search
> engines could adopt in their own pace?
> 
> We could take as a concrete use case Activity Streams 2.0 which we
> currently work on in Social WG. As I mentioned it maps almost directly
> to schema.org/Action
> 
> Mahalo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Wes Turner
> https://westurner.github.io/

Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 09:08:06 UTC