W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Why is the video property bound to creative work?

From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 22:45:45 +0200
Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Laura Dawson <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5FB4435D-F43C-41BC-9F61-80F6F921C668@ebusiness-unibw.org>
To: Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>
I would not recommend using hasPart as a generic property for relatedness.


On 19 May 2014, at 22:38, Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl> wrote:

> It's more the other way around. So in this case I want to express the main entity on a page, a MedicalProcedure, has a video giving additional information about the procedure. Something like this:
> 
> <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/MedicalProcedure">
>     <link itemprop="sameAs" href="http://www.freebase.com/m/01_mbc">
>     <span itemprop="name">Tummy Tuck</span> (<span itemrop="alternatename">abdominoplasty</span>)
>     <span itemprop="description">A Tummy Tuck, or abdominoplasty, is the most effective way to...</span>
>     <span itemprop="howPerformed">In summary the Tummy Tuck procedure takes 3-4 hours of...</span>
> 
>     <span itemprop="hasPart" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/VideoObject">
>         <link itemprop="embedURL" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjC_dCvVB8s">
>         <meta itemprop="name" content="How to get a flat stomach? tummy tuck or exercise?">
>         ...
>     </span>
> </div>
> 
> I started this thread by suggesting to add @video to Thing but that quickly evolved in the idea for a 'general' or 'related' property instead, and then halted.
> 
> Now I have a website where many MedicalProcedure, Service and Article entities have additional videos about those entities, yet only Article has properties like @associatedMediao and @video. Both MedicalProcedure and Service do not have the properties to express this. Which still leaves me questioning what I should if I do not want the VideoObject to be main entity.
> 
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 20:54:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:41 UTC