- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:46:36 -0700
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Richard, can you explain what the 'subcontract' bit is about? Are you saying that one should encode the provider, not the subcontractor? My gut feeling is that knowing who has subcontracted to whom may be a bridge too far, so maybe provider should just be... who you wish to call the provider. kc On 6/17/14, 10:42 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote: > Maybe “The person or organization providing the service, item, product, > reservation, or creative work. The provider may subcontract out the > supply of such.” - would be fractionally better. > > ~Richard > > On 17 Jun 2014, at 18:40, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org > <mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>> wrote: > >> Building on your suggestions, I would be tempted to change the >> description of ‘provider' to “The person or organization providing the >> service, item, reservation, or creative work. The provider may >> subcontract out the supply of such.”, > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 19:47:05 UTC