W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Music schema proposal

From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:20:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOr1obGJ9JocfL-gNKb_kiGbLpstrYzie_wsc-gxAuRiFeWoKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Cc: PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1. It looks like on http://sdo-music.appspot.com/MusicComposition there
> is a wrongful expected type for the musicArrangement property ?  Instead of
> it expecting a musicComposition, should it expect an AlbumRelease ?  Looks
> like a typo error or something...
>

The description should have been "an arrangement derived from this
Composition".


>
> 2. It seems that trackNumber on MusicComposition might be the wrong place
> for that property ?  But then It seems like the intent for MusicComposition
> is to encapsulate the idea of a "Song" and in that case, to easily cluster
> together multiple recordings of the same work (a MusicComposition) by the
> same artist ?  But if that is the case the schema does not currently fit
> into that mold.  Can you explain why trackNumber is on MusicComposition ?
>

The trackNumber property was for MusicRecording, not MusicComposition.

These should be fixed on the test site soon.

- Vicki



Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 18:21:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:42 UTC