W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Schema.org v1.6 release candidate: Roles, various fixes, site navigation improvements

From: Sam Goto <goto@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:31:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMtUnc4xwrOsFbVxuHGLsoOVzH4+Db9YTBecoud9CnN0WbfD6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> +Sam, Jason
>
> On 10 June 2014 00:04, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Great!  Please note the content of:
> > http://sdopending.appspot.com/asset
>
> Ah, thanks. The property 'asset' didn't exist, except it is mentioned
> in http://sdopending.appspot.com/distance
>
> (aside: the reason that link doesn't have a normal 404 page is because
> 'asset' is now minimally mentioned in the RDFS configuration file
> where 'distance' is defined; I'll add QA tests to catch this kind of
> thing - i.e. terms that have no rdfs:comment, or multiple
> rdfs:comments)
>
>     <div typeof="rdf:Property" resource="http://schema.org/distance">
>       <span class="h" property="rdfs:label">distance</span>
>       <span property="rdfs:comment">A sub property of asset. The
> distance travelled.</span>
>       <link property="rdfs:subPropertyOf" href="http://schema.org/asset"
> />
>     ...etc
>    </div>
>
> http://schema.org/distance "A sub property of asset. The distance
> travelled."
>
> Sam, Jason - looks like there was expected to be an 'asset' property
> on Action, at some point. I find it hard to see how the notion of
> asset applies naturally to a 'distance' on an exercise or travel
> action.
>
> I suggest:
>
> 1. We drop the phrase "A sub property of asset." from
> http://schema.org/distance.
>

(1) SGTM


> 2. I delete the assertion that 'distance' has a superproperty 'asset'.
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Dan
>
> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>
> >> There is a temporary review build of schema.org v1.6 for your
> >> consideration.
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 17:32:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:42 UTC