W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > June 2014

Re: offeredBy to supersede vendor, merchant, provider, seller, …?

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:54:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAChbWaN8m+tWqCfX6ieNch7=j5z38TAX3m_8ikC17hcqrpnUNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
I meant that the phrasing would be more clear by saying... an offering
represents the public announcement, not necessarily binding,...etc.
 On Jun 3, 2014 10:12 AM, "Simon Spero" <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ask your corporate counsel office about offer and acceptance, duration of
> power of acceptance, revocation, goods vs. services, etc.
> They should be able to explain why the semantics are so limited.
> On Jun 3, 2014 9:48 AM, "Thad Guidry" <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Why do folks write like that ?  ... splitting the concept of "public
>> announcement" ... no wonder search engines have such a tough time. :)
>>
>>
>>> "An offering represents the public, not necessarily binding, not
>>> necessarily exclusive, announcement by a gr:BusinessEntity to provide (or
>>> seek) a certain gr:BusinessFunction for
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Thad
>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 17:54:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:42 UTC